Should the News Cycle Be Influencing Your Portfolio?

Every week there’s a new headline. A new crisis. A new opportunity. A new reason to do something with your money right now. And the financial media is very good at making all of it feel urgent — because urgent keeps you watching.

Matt Dages has a simple answer for most of it: turn it off.

That’s the through-line of this week’s Bright Wealth Management Show, which also tackled how to know when you’re actually ready to retire, how the bucket strategy works in practice, and why annuities have a reputation problem they’ve largely outgrown.

The News Is Not Your Financial Advisor

Here’s how Matt described it on the show: by the time a headline reaches you, the professionals have already moved. Markets price in expectations almost instantly. The Fed Chair says something, the S&P ticks up or down before most people finish reading the first sentence. Acting on that information as a retail investor, especially a retiree or someone close to retirement, is almost always a losing game.

The deeper problem is emotional. Money is emotional. Watching a ticker fall while a graphic that says “Markets in Turmoil” flashes on your screen is designed to produce a reaction. And that reaction — the impulse to sell, to shift, to do something — is almost always the wrong move. Matt Dages points out that the biggest threat to most people’s portfolios isn’t the market. It’s themselves.

The SpaceX IPO is a good example. Everyone wanted in. FOMO was at full volume. And from its peak, the stock has since dropped around 40%. That’s not a knock on SpaceX as a company — it’s a reminder that hype and value aren’t the same thing, and that chasing the shiny new thing is a reliable way to buy high and sell low.

What actually works, according to the principles Matt applies at Bright Wealth Management, is staying invested, staying disciplined, and having a plan that can hold steady when the headlines can’t. Time in the market, not timing the market.

How Do You Know When You’re Ready to Retire?

The answer isn’t a number. It’s not an age. It’s whether your assets can reliably replace your paycheck.

That sounds simple but unpacking it is where the real planning happens. Most people overestimate what they need and underestimate what they’re already spending on things they haven’t fully accounted for — taxes, healthcare, inflation. Those three consistently catch people off guard.

The tax piece alone is significant. The majority of people’s retirement savings sit in pre-tax accounts. Every dollar they pull out is taxable income. Factor in RMDs, Social Security taxation, and the IRMAA surcharges that drive up Medicare premiums when income crosses certain thresholds, and the gap between gross and net can be wide. A written financial plan with a real tax projection closes that gap before it becomes a surprise.

Healthcare is another one. Medicare premiums, supplemental coverage, and potential long-term care costs can run $500 to $800 a month or more for some households. That’s a significant recurring expense that doesn’t show up in most people’s mental math when they’re calculating whether they can afford to retire.

Social Security timing is also part of the retirement readiness equation — and it’s one that can be worth six or seven figures over the course of a retirement when optimized correctly. Matt’s team runs the analysis for every client: not just “when should I claim?” but how does the answer change based on age gap between spouses, earnings history, survivor benefit implications, and the interaction with other income sources.

The goal isn’t to hit a magic number. The goal is to build a plan that shows you, visually and in writing, exactly how long your money lasts and what income looks like at every stage. When you can see that, you stop moving the goalposts.

The Bucket Strategy: Simple, Visual, and It Works

The bucket strategy is exactly what it sounds like. You divide your money into three buckets based on when you’ll need it.

The short-term bucket covers current expenses — this year’s bills, emergencies, the money you’d need if the market went sideways tomorrow. Think six to twelve months of living expenses in cash, money market funds, or short-term treasuries. The whole point is that this money never has to be sold at a bad time. It’s there, it’s liquid, and it buys you peace of mind to take more risk elsewhere.

The mid-term bucket covers the next three to five years. This sits in the middle — not cash, not aggressive growth funds. Diversified index funds, balanced ETFs, a mix of income and moderate growth. It’s the bridge between what you need now and what you’re growing for the long run.

The long-term bucket is your growth engine. Ten-plus year horizon, more aggressive allocation, positioned to outpace inflation and compound over time. This is where your Roth IRA money ideally lives, since you won’t touch it first and it grows tax-free. This is where you can hold a position like SpaceX for a decade without caring what it does next Tuesday.

The elegance of this approach is that it takes the emotion out of market volatility. When the market drops, you’re not panicking because you don’t need to sell your long-term bucket to pay for groceries. The short-term bucket handles that. Everything else gets to ride it out.

Annuities: Not a Four-Letter Word

Matt Dages is clear on this one: annuities are a tool. Not a solution. Not a scam. Not the answer to everything. A tool.

The bad reputation mostly comes from variable annuities — products that are directly tied to market performance, carry significant fees (sometimes four or five percent annually), and can lose value. Those deserve skepticism. But variable annuities are one category of a much broader product landscape, and lumping all annuities together based on the worst version of them is like refusing to fly because a hot air balloon once crashed.

Fixed and fixed-indexed annuities are a different conversation. No direct market exposure, principal protection, guaranteed income potential, and in today’s interest rate environment, some products are offering returns and guarantees that haven’t been available in years. Matt’s point was direct: these rates won’t last. If the opportunity fits someone’s plan, waiting could mean waiting past the window.

The big firms that actively market against annuities have a pretty straightforward reason for doing so — they can charge ongoing management fees on assets they hold, and they can’t do that with an annuity placed with an insurance company. That’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s just an incentive structure worth understanding when you’re evaluating advice.

For retirees who already have annuities — especially older ones — Matt’s guidance is to evaluate them against what the current market offers. Many people don’t realize those funds can be moved, rolled over, or repositioned. An annuity that made sense in a low-rate environment five years ago might look very different compared to what’s available today.

The bottom line: annuities aren’t right for everyone, but they’re worth understanding rather than dismissing based on old information or marketing from people who benefit from you not having one.

Listen to more episodes of the Bright Wealth Management Show here

Leave a Comment